logo-profile

OTICE

.COM

.NG


Home of Nigeria Latest News and Updated Information
tag-iconSport
tag-iconchelsea , lampard , Nathan Ake

Why Lampard decided not to bring Man City-bound Nathan Ake back to Chelsea - EPL

user_icon Posted by:
Tiamiyu Saheed Oluwatosin
views-icon Views:
69
like-icon Page likes:
0
dislike-icon Page dislikes:
0
comments-iconComments:
0
calendar-icon Posted on: 2020-07-31 11:10:02
share-icon Share(s):
0
NEWS DEFAULT4



Chelsea have decided not to activate a buyback clause in order to sign Nathan Ake from Bournemouth, because manager Frank Lampard does not view the Dutch defender as an upgrade on the club’s centre-backs, As stated by The Athletic.
Ake is set to sign for Manchester City after a £41million bid was accepted on Thursday. https://Notice.Com.Ng.ng/2020/07/30/epl-man-city-agree-e43m-deal-for-nathan-ake/
The 25-year-old joined Bournemouth in 2017 in a £20m deal from Chelsea.
The Blues inserted a £40m buyback clause in his contract, which meant they could re-sign the defender for twice what they sold him for.
The clause effectively gives Chelsea first refusal on Ake and the club have a short window says believed to be 72 hours says in which they can activate the clause after Bournemouth notified the Blues of their accepted bid.
However, there is no chance of Chelsea matching the bid, as Lampard only wants to recruit a top level centre-back this summer.

DO YOU KNOW >>> RB Leipzig to play PSG in semi-final - Champions League

READ ALSO >>> Atletico Madrid goalkeeper, Oblak speaks on joining Chelsea

READ ALSO >>> Lampard reveals why Willian will not play in Champions League tie - Bayern versus Chelsea

READ ALSO >>> Man City complete £41million deal for defender - Nathan Ake

BREAKING >>> NEMA takes action - Nationwide flood


For All Nigeria Past Questions Visit www.QUESTION.NG

Kindly share this post on different Social Media below


COMMENTS

NOTE: User comments in this section are, as the name implies, provided by users of this website. The question.ng team is not responsible for, nor do they endorse, any of the information provided here.


NO POSTED COMMENT