Enugu Deputy Governor lied – Chime’s aide - Impeachment
Tiamiyu Saheed Oluwatosin
The Enugu State Government has described as false and misleading the testimony by the Deputy Governor of the State, Mr Sunday Onyebuchi that Governor Sullivan Chime operates a poultry and piggery at the Government House.
A statement signed by Chukwudi Achife, the Chief Press Secretary to Governor Chime, further said the Deputy Governor’s claims were intended to deceive the public.
He explained that while the Government maintains an Agric Unit as part of the Government House structure where livestock are kept for slaughter to serve the needs of the staff as well as both the governor and deputy governor’s premises, the unit was neither operated nor owned by the Governor.
Achife said: “Our attention has been drawn to media reports credited to the Deputy Governor in which he alleged that Governor Chime owns a poultry and a piggery inside the Government House.
DO YOU KNOW >>> PDP chieftain Olopoeyan, Senator Balogus trade words - Oyo 2023
READ ALSO >>> Remi Oyo was a consummate professional – Chime
“Much as we would not want to join issues with His Excellency, the Deputy Governor (Onyebuchi), it has become necessary for us to put the records straight.
“The Deputy Governor’s claims that Governor Chime runs a poultry in the Government is most unfortunate and surprising. This is because it is patently untrue and the Deputy Governor knows better.
“The truth is that there is an Agric Unit in the Government House where livestock are held for the use of the Government House. It has been in existence since the Government House was built and had served previous administrations in Enugu. It is neither commercially operated nor is it owned by the Governor.
“The unit is manned by civil servants including a veterinary doctor. Funds for its maintenance are provided for in the annual budget of the Government. The unit also serves the Deputy Governor. As a matter of fact, staff of the unit slaughtered a cow from the unit at the request of the Deputy Governor on August 4, 2014.
“So, if as the unit as he (Onyebuchi) erroneously claims belongs to the Governor, why should it form part of the state’s annual budgets? Why would the Deputy Governor request the unit to slaughter cows for him from its livestock holding?”
Continuing, Achife said: “It is important to clarify that the said Agric unit is not within the Governor’s residential premises but a unit in Government House, which has other units like the Press unit, Drivers’ unit, among others. The Agric unit serves the purpose of holding livestock for periodic slaughter for use by Government House staff, the Governor’s lodge and the Deputy Governor’s lodge. It was on the strength of this fact that he (Onyebuchi) requested the staff of the unit to slaughter a cow for him from the unit’s holding on August 4, 2014, and this was done.
“Now, the other question to ask is, since the Deputy Governor is fully aware of the existence of this unit and benefits from its services, why was he operating another one? The truth, in spite of that, is that he was operating a commercial poultry with his own staff, including as he admitted in his evidence, a marketing manager.
“The poultry in his residential quarters was relocated after he refused all official entreaties to do so, being fully aware that running a commercial poultry within his residential premises, clearly violated a policy of government. So, why would the State’s Number Two citizen violate a policy made by his own Government?”
Meanwhile, on Onyebuchi’s claims on what transpired between the panel and counsel to the parties on the day he slumped, Mr. Nduka Ikeyi, Counsel to the Enugu State House of Assembly at the panel investigating the allegations of gross misconduct against the Deputy Governor, noted that some of the news reports on the proceedings had been “most inaccurate and full of conjectures” adding that there also appears to be a deliberate effort to exclude reportage of evidence considered damaging to the Deputy Governor’s defence.
According to him, none of the reports had so far reflected the evidence given by witnesses to the House of Assembly, nor did they reflect evidence elicited under cross-examination from the Deputy Governor’s witnesses.
Regarding the said inaccuracy of the reports, Ikeyi said it was, for example, completely untrue, as reported in some newspapers that the Panel continued proceedings after the Deputy Governor slumped on Wednesday, while being led in evidence by his counsel, Mr. Peter Eze.
He said that contrary to the report, the Panel rose immediately the Deputy Governor was rushed out of the court room, and later invited counsel on both sides to discuss how to deal with the situation.
As stated by him, “It was then agreed that the Panel should resume by 2pm to receive a report on the doctor’s evaluation of the Deputy Governor’s condition.
“When the Panel resumed sitting at 2pm, Chief Chris Aghanwa, lead counsel to the Deputy Governor tendered a report, which showed that the Deputy Governor had postural hypertension. Counsel to the Deputy Governor however asked that the matter be adjourned to Monday 18 August. The Panel however preferred to deal with the matter one day at a time; and directed the parties to return the following day (Thursday) to receive further update on the state of health of the Deputy Governor”.
“On Thursday (14 August), Counsel to the Deputy Governor reported that he was not yet in a condition to continue his testimony and once again applied for the matter to be adjourned to Monday, 18 August and further stated that the Deputy Governor would be his last witness, meaning that he would no longer require the evidence of the government officials whom he had earlier caused to be summoned”.
Mr. Ikeyi added that he responded that he did not object to the application for adjournment, but requested that since the His Excellency, the Deputy Governor was a public officer in the Enugu State Government, that the Panel should obtain the opinion of a specialist cardiologist from a medical facility operated by the State Government.
He said that he did not, in any way, doubt the competence or objectivity of Dr. Anusiuba, who had seen the Deputy Governor immediately after the unfortunate incident, but added that Dr. Anisuba, who works at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, (UNTH), however saw the Deputy Governor as his private patient and not as a patient of the UNTH.
Mr. Ikeyi said that the Panel which he noted, had continued to show deep concern for the health of the Deputy Governor agreed with him and directed that a cardiologist from the ESUT Teaching Hospital be given access to evaluate the Deputy Governor and report back to the Panel.
He wondered where the persons who claimed that the Panel rejected medical advice and insisted that “the Deputy Governor be brought back to the hearing immediately, even in a wheelchair or stretcher” got their story from”.
For All Nigeria Past Questions Visit www.QUESTION.NG
Kindly share this post on different Social Media below
NOTE: User comments in this section are, as the name implies, provided by users of this website. The question.ng team is not responsible for, nor do they endorse, any of the information provided here.