logo-profile

OTICE

.COM

.NG


Home of Nigeria Latest News and Updated Information
tag-iconNews
tag-iconAtiku’s son-in-law , Court , EFCC

EFCC re-arraigns Atiku’s son-in-law in court

user_icon Posted by:
Tiamiyu Saheed Oluwatosin
views-icon Views:
37
like-icon Page likes:
0
dislike-icon Page dislikes:
0
comments-iconComments:
0
calendar-icon Posted on: 2019-10-21 04:17:48
share-icon Share(s):
0
ABDULLAHI-BABALELE-ATIKU-EFCC



The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday, re-arraigned Abdullahi Babalele, son-in-law to Ex-Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar, over alleged money laundering charges.

Press had reported thatthe EFCC accused Babalele of allegedly laundering about 140,000 dollars, in the build-up to the last general elections.

The defendant was first arraigned on Aug. 14, during the court’s vacation before Justice Nicholas Oweibo, who sat as vacation judge.

He had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was granted bail in the sum of N20 million with one surety in like sum.

DO YOU KNOW >>> Kwara governor nominates Bisola, five others as commissioners

READ ALSO >>>

in spite of that, following a re-assignment of the case file to a new judge, Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, the defendant was re-arraigned on Tuesday.NAN reports.

He also pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Justice Aneke granted his request to continue on the earlier bail condition granted him by Justice Oweibo.

Meanwhile, after his re-arraignment, Babalele applied to the court for a release of his international passport to enable him travel abroad for medical treatment.

READ ALSO >>> Appeal court upholds Senator Uba Sani’s election

READ ALSO >>> EFCC explains why Mompha was arrested in Abuja

But the prosecution counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo who appeared with A.O Mohammed, opposed the application, arguing that there was no proof that his condition could not be treated in Nigeria.

Justice Aneke has, in spite of that, adjourned until Oct. 11 for ruling on the bail application.

In the charge, EFCC accused the defendant of “procuring one Mohammed to make a cash payment of the sum of 140,000 dollars, without going through any financial institution.”

The prosecution said that the money exceeded the threshold stipulated by the Money laundering Act.

BREAKING >>> Senator Gaya speaks on Osinbajo being ‘tribalistic’

He said that the defendant committed the offence on Feb. 20.

The offences contravene the provisions of Section 16(2) and 18 (c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011.


For All Nigeria Past Questions Visit www.QUESTION.NG


COMMENTS

NOTE: User comments in this section are, as the name implies, provided by users of this website. The question.ng team is not responsible for, nor do they endorse, any of the information provided here.


NO POSTED COMMENT