Home of Nigeria Latest News and Updated Information

Buhari panel dragged to court

user_icon Posted by:
Tiamiyu Saheed Oluwatosin
views-icon Views:
like-icon Page likes:
dislike-icon Page dislikes:
calendar-icon Posted on: 2019-07-07 14:54:58
share-icon Share(s):

The Special Presidential Investigation Panel on Recovery of Public Property (SPIP), has been dragged before a Federal High Court in Abuja, over an alleged take over of property belonging to a private investor.

The panel was sued by D. B. Mangal Ltd., praying for an order of the court to stop the panel from sealing off its property and forcefully ejecting, harassing and intimidating the occupants of the building, NAN reports.

In an originating summons marked FHC/ABJ/CS/570/2019, D.B. Mangal Ltd. is urging the court to determine whether going by the provisions of the Public Property (Special Provisions) Act Cap. R4 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) 2005.

The Okoi Obono-Oblah led panel is empowered to investigate issues bothering on ownership title and which had been adjudicated upon and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

DO YOU KNOW >>> Court remands two men over alleged rape of minors in Abuja

READ ALSO >>> Nigeria will exit recession in first quarter of 2021 says Buhari Government assures

Also joined in the suit as defendants are the Petroleum Financial Corporate Ltd. the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA).

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), reports that both Federal High Court and Court of Appeal had in their judgments held that the panel lacked the power to prosecute crimes bordering on non-declaration of assets.

Specifically, the Court of Appeal in a unanimous judgment delivered by Justice Hussein Muhktar, also held that the panel lacked the constitutional power to seize property of alleged offenders without valid court order.

The decision of the appellate court was in respect of an appeal filed by

READ ALSO >>> Court remands two men over alleged rape of minors in Abuja

BREAKING >>> Anele Ngcongca, South African player dies in car crash

Tijani Tumsah, to challenge an order of interim forfeiture made by the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in Abuja.

This, was in respect of some 86 cars linked to Tijani and his brother, Ibrahim Tumsah.

The five-man panel of Justices of the Court of Appeal held that no provision of the Recovery of Public Property Act Cap R 4, LFN 2004 empowers the panel to initiate court proceedings.

Pursuant to its investigative powers for the purpose of obtaining an interim order for forfeiture of property.

It added that “the panel cannot clothe itself with the clothes not donated to it by the Act that established it.”

In the instant suit filed by Shehu Wada, the plaintiff prayed the court for an order directing the panel to immediately vacate and cause to be removed the inscription “SPIP Under Investigation” pasted and inscribed on various places on its property described as Plot 1405, Cadastral Zone AO5, Maitama, Abuja.

Attached to the suit as exhibits include: title documents, a Certificate of Occupancy (Cof O) no: 1951W-14fz-64cbr-10220-20 registered as No. 18125 in volume 90 of the Certificate of Occupancy Register in the Lands Registry Office, at Abuja, which is dated Oct. 31, 2006 and undersigned by the then FCT Minister, Mallam Nasir Ahmed El-Rufai.

Also attached to the originating summons is Certified True Copy of the judgment of Justice Ugochukwu Ogakwu of the FCT High in suit FCT/HC/238/2006 between the plaintiff and the defendants delivered on Feb.2, 2012, which held that the title to Plot 1405 Cadastral Zone AO5, Maitama, Abuja validly belong to the plaintiff.

The Obla panel had on Wednesday, June 19, handed over the said property to the National Board for Technical Education (NBTE), in a controversial circumstances in spite the pendency of the suit.

Before the hand over, the panel had last month placed the property housing the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), under investigation.

The property, Murjanatu House, which is being managed by Zamani Estate Agency and Property Ltd. also housed branches of First Bank Nigeria Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank, among others.

Making the presentation to the Executive Secretary of National Board for Techn8cal Education (NBTE), Dr Masaudu Kazaure, chairman of the Panel, Obono-Obla explained that the property, was originally allocated to NBTE.

This, was before a spurious claim of a revocation of the title of NBTE, by D.B. Mangal Ltd. which was obviously in total disregard of the extant laws of the country in that respect.

Obla said the property became a subject of investigation following a petition to the panel on Dec. 12, 2018, by one Ambassador Abdullah Alifa, the chairman of Petroleum Financial Corporate (PFC), Ltd.

The petitioner said the encroachment happened after his company had paid N24million to the Abuja Geographical Information System (AGIS), in 2005 for the recertification of the certificate of occupancy of the NBTE property.

This, he said, was handed over to PFC on behalf of the NBTE.

in spite of that, in the instant suit, the plaintiff has equally exhibited a motion on notice in suit No. FHC/HC/CV/238/2006 filed by NBTE.

This, it claimed, that the property did not belong to it and prayed the court for “an order striking out its name as a party to the suit.”

In the said motion dated May 31, 2007, counsel to NBTE and Ex-Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abdullahi Ibrahim, SAN, had informed the court that his client “never instructed or consented to the institution/initiation and /or continuation of this suit.”

In his ruling on the said motion, Justice Ogakwu accordingly struck out the name of NBTE from the suit as a plaintiff on record.

in spite of that, no date has been fixed for hearing in the suit.

For All Nigeria Past Questions Visit www.QUESTION.NG

Kindly share this post on different Social Media below



NOTE: User comments in this section are, as the name implies, provided by users of this website. The question.ng team is not responsible for, nor do they endorse, any of the information provided here.